The Dunning-Kruger Effect and the secret for coping with the incompetents around you
There’s nothing more exasperating than being an expert and having to deal with someone who isn’t but is quite certain he or she is. I experience this frequently and I know you do too. And guess what? There’s actually a name for it: the Dunning-Kruger Effect.
Wikipedia defines the Dunning-Kruger Effect like this: “… the phenomenon wherein people who have little knowledge think that they know more than others who have much more knowledge.”
Sound familiar?
Here’s a good example. Long ago I was interviewing for an ad agency job in Las Vegas. When the guy who owned the small agency found out I was interested in direct response, he began explaining to me that no headline should ever, EVER, be more than seven words. Seven was the magic number. And the magic number was seven. Six, maybe. Sometimes five. But never eight. And certainly not nine. 10 was right out.
When I asked him why, he took on the air of superiority that I didn’t have a name for then and repeated that seven words were magic.
Yup, Dunning-Kruger Effect.
Here’s another example. I was hired by an agency in my home town to consult on an AARP mailing. (I’m not picking on agencies. These are the just the examples that come to mind.) In routine fashion, I analyzed past mailings and determined that, among other things, the most successful direct mail packages used re-positionable tokens. You know, the little stickers that you can remove from one part of a mailer and affix to another part, usually onto the reply form. They often are printed with the words “Yes” or “I accept” or something similar.
During my conversation with the art director, I informed him about the conclusions of my analysis and suggested we create a package with a token. We were walking down the hall toward his office when I said that. He stopped, turned, and with a face that looked like he had just stepped in something foul, said, “We don’t DO stickers. They’re tacky.” He was firm on this and forbade tokens, handwriting, typewriter fonts, starbursts, and a variety of other tactics.
Dunning-Kruger Effect.
So what exactly is this Dunning-Kruger Effect? Well, these two guys named David Dunning and Justin Kruger, both working at Cornell University, ran a series of experiments and published the results in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology in December 1999.
What they found was that, and I quote, “ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.” Specifically they concluded:
- Incompetent individuals tend to overestimate their own level of skill.
- Incompetent individuals fail to recognize genuine skill in others.
- Incompetent individuals fail to recognize the extremity of their inadequacy.
- If they can be trained to substantially improve their own skill level, these individuals can recognize and acknowledge their own previous lack of skill.
Can you see the irony here? Those with the least knowledge and the lowest level of skill tend to be the most confident. And who do people look to for leadership? Those with confidence. So we are destined to be led by the incompetent. Aren’t we? I see it in advertising and marketing. Everyone sees it in politics. It happens in schools (those who can’t, teach). It’s everywhere.
And do you really believe that last point, that those who are incompetent can be trained to be competent and realize their previous incompetence? Hmm. I’m not sure about that.
I don’t have a solution for this. But I do have a suggestion. Whenever this happens to you, I want you to take a deep breath and say, “Dunning-Kruger Effect.” Don’t explain. Just say it and walk away. The ninny won’t know what it means and will be too stupid to look it up.
But you’ll feel a whole lot better.
We won’t call it an inside joke. Let’s call it healthy coping.
No related posts.
Comments
13 Responses to “The Dunning-Kruger Effect and the secret for coping with the incompetents around you”
Leave a Reply
RSS
Email
Twitter
LinkedIn
I love this post,its just great I have had the same effect when working with “art directors” , And all I have to say is they have no idea when it comes to web. “stay with choosing color” let the rest of the stuff get done by web pro’s.
Great post. Never heard of this before, but I have seen it in people far more often than I would like to.
Hmm… I just called it “Farva Syndrome” (Super Troopers, you’ll get it.)
A guy I know used to be 31 flavors of incompetent with computers in my Computer Repair class, but he’d maintain that not only did he know what he was doing, but that the rest of us didn’t have a clue.
We gave him the nickname “Farva” for that one, and its stuck with him into the Navy (3 years… wow…)
“PFC Farva, reporting as ordered, sir!”
The way I read point 4 was that the people who could be trained could recognize their previous incompetence. This doesn’t mean that all incompetent people can be trained.
I think your blog demonstrates the effect better than the examples of the people you cite as incompetent. It would have helped your case to demonstrate what competent people can do instead of only pointing out what your self-assessed competence led you to write. I don’t disagree with your premise that it is a way to better understand annoying people who might not understand your level of knowledge in your particular skill set, but you are missing the other half of the study done by Dunning and Kruger.
“In short, the same knowledge that underlies
the ability to produce correct judgment [the best way to direct market] is also the knowledge that underlies the ability to recognize correct judgment.[to know why their reason's for objecting to your ideas were errant] To lack the
former is to be deficient in the latter.
So ultimately, it is ignorance and not arrogance that the study uncovered regarding incompetent’s difficulties in recognizing their own incompetence which leads to inflated self-assessments.
I think the Dunning-Kruger effect can be a good thing sometimes! It protects us from hating ourselves. I’m not sure if i would want to knoow all my short falls!
Here is a good video about it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jb8CXDhLPsA
None of your examples are the Dunning-Kruger Effect. You’re just using Dunning-Kruger as a means to pad your own ego against people who dared disagree with you.
Gosh. You sure put me in my place. Though you might consider that it’s not ego when you have the expertise to know that those who disagree with you are actually wrong.
These examples might be the DK effect or they might not. It’s certainly true that clinging to a simplistic rule in the face of reasons to the contrary may indicate overconfidence in one’s competence. If these people were incapable of having a reasoned discussion in which they successfully defended their assertions, but clung to those assertions nevertheless, that would likely be a good example of the DK effect. We just need a bit more evidence.
What’s particularly tricky about the DK effect is that those suffering from it are most likely to attribute it to others. Remember, one of D&K’s findings in their initial study was that highly competent people tend to assume others are equally competent, while the incompetent tend to assume others are inferior. So if you go around constantly invoking the DK effect w/r/t others’ behavior, you just might be exhibiting it yourself.
DK:
In the direct marketing field, techniques are judged by mathematics. Knowing which techniques work and which don’t is a matter of experience with the actual results of testing. So if I suggest a technique that has been proven by numerical results and it is rejected without logical evidence but merely on an assumption or because of personal taste, I think that qualifies as a good example of DK.
Only one name comes to mind, “OBAMA”.
Dean Rieck: “if I suggest a technique that has been proven by numerical results and it is rejected without logical evidence but merely on an assumption or because of personal taste, I think that qualifies as a good example of DK.”
Yes, I think this is right. I didn’t see that kind of exchange happening in the first example in your blog. If you said to the interviewer, “Actually, extensive and credible statistical studies show that there is no ‘magic number’ for determining the most effective headline,” and he simply responded by repeating himself, then his response seems to indicate the D-K effect. But merely asserting a confident conclusion doesn’t mean you lack reasons, and my reading of the first interaction in your blog doesn’t indicate that a substantive conversation took place. But then again, I may be wrong; your description may have left this information out.
More generally, I’m skeptical that the D-K effect should be used as a means of reaffirming one’s own superiority in the world. The ironies of the D-K effect are many, but among them is that the less skilled you are, the more likely you are to think that others are inferior. I worry that the increasing popularity of the D-K effect will actually do much to reaffirm the confidence of unskilled people in their own illusory greatness.
Used to work for a guy just like this. When he was hired, several of us “less confident” people commented on his apparent lack of knowledge and skill. He revised monthly internal reporting requirements nearly every month. Just didn’t know what he was doing, or what data needed to be reported. He managed to lay-off the majority of us (best thing that ever happened to me!) before the company president realized his mistake, and gave the guy the treatment he deserved.