<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why &#8220;corporate&#8221; ads waste money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.directcreative.com/blog/corporate-ads/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.directcreative.com/blog/corporate-ads</link>
	<description>Dean Rieck on Copywriting &#38; Direct Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:56:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why Corporate Ads Waste Money &#124; Poke the Beehive</title>
		<link>http://www.directcreative.com/blog/corporate-ads/comment-page-1#comment-33215</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Corporate Ads Waste Money &#124; Poke the Beehive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directcreative.com/blog/?p=736#comment-33215</guid>
		<description>[...] have said it better myself. Check out this post at Direct Creative Blog on why nicely designed say-nothing corporate advertising is a big waste of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have said it better myself. Check out this post at Direct Creative Blog on why nicely designed say-nothing corporate advertising is a big waste of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawson R</title>
		<link>http://www.directcreative.com/blog/corporate-ads/comment-page-1#comment-29962</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawson R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 05:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directcreative.com/blog/?p=736#comment-29962</guid>
		<description>I remember that show. That statement is very true. Speaking from experience, most &quot;creatives&quot; don&#039;t really care if websites are easy to use, or easy to understand for users. They just want to win awards. 

What wins awards? Flashy eye-candy work wins awards. What was this ad&#039;s objective? Who cares it looks pretty. Lets convince the naive client they need more ads, so we can get more money from them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember that show. That statement is very true. Speaking from experience, most &#8220;creatives&#8221; don&#8217;t really care if websites are easy to use, or easy to understand for users. They just want to win awards. </p>
<p>What wins awards? Flashy eye-candy work wins awards. What was this ad&#8217;s objective? Who cares it looks pretty. Lets convince the naive client they need more ads, so we can get more money from them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Rieck</title>
		<link>http://www.directcreative.com/blog/corporate-ads/comment-page-1#comment-29278</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Rieck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directcreative.com/blog/?p=736#comment-29278</guid>
		<description>Ted: 
Well, I didn&#039;t say it in the article, but accountability is exactly what a lot of agencies want to avoid. Once you get into that, you have to deliver. You can&#039;t rely on sales execs to blow smoke and keep the client happy for a couple or three years while the agency gets rich on billing. 

There was TV show called Thirtysomething back in the late 80s. Two of the lead characters worked at an ad agency. In one episode, the agency owner explained the purpose of an ad agency something like this: &quot;We create ads to win awards. We win awards to get new clients. We get new clients to create more ads to win more awards.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted:<br />
Well, I didn&#8217;t say it in the article, but accountability is exactly what a lot of agencies want to avoid. Once you get into that, you have to deliver. You can&#8217;t rely on sales execs to blow smoke and keep the client happy for a couple or three years while the agency gets rich on billing. </p>
<p>There was TV show called Thirtysomething back in the late 80s. Two of the lead characters worked at an ad agency. In one episode, the agency owner explained the purpose of an ad agency something like this: &#8220;We create ads to win awards. We win awards to get new clients. We get new clients to create more ads to win more awards.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Grigg</title>
		<link>http://www.directcreative.com/blog/corporate-ads/comment-page-1#comment-29271</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Grigg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directcreative.com/blog/?p=736#comment-29271</guid>
		<description>Nothing we say will ever dissuade some of the creative teams or advertisers who just don&#039;t understand that advertising exists for one reason -- selling products and services.

Positioning and awareness advertising are simply strategies that drive demand. They are not the objectives. Sometimes, these strategies must take a back seat to creating sales more quickly -- like within this decade.

But unfortunately, many advertisers and their suppliers forget that selling and delivering the product do not take away from awareness or positioning. In fact, the advertising becomes accountable and must now yield good ROIs the CEOs keep asking for (in vain it seems).

In fact, in this Internet age, successful companies know how to do all of these things at the same time.

Today’s extreme market segmentation does not support nebulous messages or meaningless chatter. Actually, it never did. But now the pressure is on to deliver sales as the competition for attention escalates.

So your post is right on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing we say will ever dissuade some of the creative teams or advertisers who just don&#8217;t understand that advertising exists for one reason &#8212; selling products and services.</p>
<p>Positioning and awareness advertising are simply strategies that drive demand. They are not the objectives. Sometimes, these strategies must take a back seat to creating sales more quickly &#8212; like within this decade.</p>
<p>But unfortunately, many advertisers and their suppliers forget that selling and delivering the product do not take away from awareness or positioning. In fact, the advertising becomes accountable and must now yield good ROIs the CEOs keep asking for (in vain it seems).</p>
<p>In fact, in this Internet age, successful companies know how to do all of these things at the same time.</p>
<p>Today’s extreme market segmentation does not support nebulous messages or meaningless chatter. Actually, it never did. But now the pressure is on to deliver sales as the competition for attention escalates.</p>
<p>So your post is right on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
