<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can good design be ugly?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.directcreative.com/blog/can-good-design-be-ugly/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.directcreative.com/blog/can-good-design-be-ugly</link>
	<description>Dean Rieck on Copywriting &#38; Direct Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:09:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.directcreative.com/blog/can-good-design-be-ugly/comment-page-1#comment-40885</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directcreative.com/blog/?p=263#comment-40885</guid>
		<description>The Drudge Report must be one of the greatest sites ever created… I’ve checked it daily for years, not becasue of its aesthetics, but because it rarely disappoints. When I check Drudge, I can be reasonably assured that I’ve seen the most important news of the day without having to visit multiple sites. I also use http://www.repolitical.com for daily political news even though it actually looks worse than Drudge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Drudge Report must be one of the greatest sites ever created… I’ve checked it daily for years, not becasue of its aesthetics, but because it rarely disappoints. When I check Drudge, I can be reasonably assured that I’ve seen the most important news of the day without having to visit multiple sites. I also use <a href="http://www.repolitical.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.repolitical.com</a> for daily political news even though it actually looks worse than Drudge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Rieck</title>
		<link>http://www.directcreative.com/blog/can-good-design-be-ugly/comment-page-1#comment-15289</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Rieck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directcreative.com/blog/?p=263#comment-15289</guid>
		<description>Cynthia: LOL I&#039;m so sorry you feel like Clinton. I hope you&#039;ll feel better soon. 

Good means effective. Doing the job it&#039;s supposed to do. It does not necessarily mean &quot;attractive.&quot; Advertising is about selling, not art. 

Good point, though. Because there is a big disconnect on this point sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cynthia: LOL I&#8217;m so sorry you feel like Clinton. I hope you&#8217;ll feel better soon. </p>
<p>Good means effective. Doing the job it&#8217;s supposed to do. It does not necessarily mean &#8220;attractive.&#8221; Advertising is about selling, not art. </p>
<p>Good point, though. Because there is a big disconnect on this point sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia Maniglia</title>
		<link>http://www.directcreative.com/blog/can-good-design-be-ugly/comment-page-1#comment-15286</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia Maniglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directcreative.com/blog/?p=263#comment-15286</guid>
		<description>I feel like Bill Clinton ...

&quot;Depends what you mean by the word &#039;good.&#039;&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like Bill Clinton &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Depends what you mean by the word &#8216;good.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Rieck</title>
		<link>http://www.directcreative.com/blog/can-good-design-be-ugly/comment-page-1#comment-14299</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Rieck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 23:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directcreative.com/blog/?p=263#comment-14299</guid>
		<description>vanderleun: Yes. Generally simple wins. Drudge is a good example of that. 

Ted: Drudge may be an example of function over form. If you&#039;re into news or politics, Drudge always delivers something interesting. Frankly, I think its ugliness is part of the appeal. Nothing else looks like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vanderleun: Yes. Generally simple wins. Drudge is a good example of that. </p>
<p>Ted: Drudge may be an example of function over form. If you&#8217;re into news or politics, Drudge always delivers something interesting. Frankly, I think its ugliness is part of the appeal. Nothing else looks like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Grigg</title>
		<link>http://www.directcreative.com/blog/can-good-design-be-ugly/comment-page-1#comment-14296</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Grigg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 22:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directcreative.com/blog/?p=263#comment-14296</guid>
		<description>You can sure pick them. This site looks terrible. But the copy is good. It&#039;s nothing but a link list consisting of headlines with a few pictures interspersed to give the eye a rest.

But to your point, it seems like ugly almost always wins in DM.

Maybe its the power of content over appearance. Or copy over design.

But back to the Drudge Report, all of the underlining makes it hard to read for me. It&#039;s overkill. It discourages scanning because most people aren&#039;t use to reading with that much underlinEd copy.

Of course, it may be unavoidable if every sentence is linked. The Internet protocol for linked text requires underlining.

So one has to ask. Could the site perform better with a modified layout? One wonders if they got there through testing. Or is it even worth testing such a big winner?

Entrepreneurs like Drudge find a way to break the norms. And the end  result is not always pretty. But people buy for reasons that transcend beauty or immediately recognizable logic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can sure pick them. This site looks terrible. But the copy is good. It&#8217;s nothing but a link list consisting of headlines with a few pictures interspersed to give the eye a rest.</p>
<p>But to your point, it seems like ugly almost always wins in DM.</p>
<p>Maybe its the power of content over appearance. Or copy over design.</p>
<p>But back to the Drudge Report, all of the underlining makes it hard to read for me. It&#8217;s overkill. It discourages scanning because most people aren&#8217;t use to reading with that much underlinEd copy.</p>
<p>Of course, it may be unavoidable if every sentence is linked. The Internet protocol for linked text requires underlining.</p>
<p>So one has to ask. Could the site perform better with a modified layout? One wonders if they got there through testing. Or is it even worth testing such a big winner?</p>
<p>Entrepreneurs like Drudge find a way to break the norms. And the end  result is not always pretty. But people buy for reasons that transcend beauty or immediately recognizable logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanderleun</title>
		<link>http://www.directcreative.com/blog/can-good-design-be-ugly/comment-page-1#comment-14007</link>
		<dc:creator>vanderleun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directcreative.com/blog/?p=263#comment-14007</guid>
		<description>Key for me in that list is &quot;one page.&quot; 

More and more I&#039;m coming to see that anything below about a scroll and a half is wasted.

In general, probably because of sites like Drudge, the browser won&#039;t scroll much but will click.

Why? It&#039;s easier. And easier wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Key for me in that list is &#8220;one page.&#8221; </p>
<p>More and more I&#8217;m coming to see that anything below about a scroll and a half is wasted.</p>
<p>In general, probably because of sites like Drudge, the browser won&#8217;t scroll much but will click.</p>
<p>Why? It&#8217;s easier. And easier wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
